Safety & Alignment Research

Building AI That
Stays Safe

We develop AI systems designed to remain beneficial even under adversarial conditions, distribution shift, and edge cases. Safety is not a feature, it's an architectural principle.

"The question is not whether AI will be powerful, but whether it will be controllable. We build for the latter."

TeraSystemsAI Safety Charter
Core Principles

Our Safety Philosophy

Four pillars that guide every system we build, every model we deploy, and every decision we make.

Defense in Depth

Multiple independent safety layers ensure that no single point of failure can compromise the system. We assume adversarial conditions and design accordingly.

5
Safety Layers
99.97%
Containment Rate

Value Alignment

Our systems are trained to understand and respect human intentions, not just optimize narrow metrics. We use constitutional AI and RLHF to maintain alignment under pressure.

94%
Intent Match
< 0.1%
Misalignment Rate

Adversarial Robustness

Every model undergoes rigorous red-teaming and adversarial testing. We actively search for failure modes before deployment, not after incidents occur.

10K+
Attack Vectors Tested
72hr
Red Team Cycles

Radical Transparency

We publish model cards, safety evaluations, and incident reports. When systems fail, we share what went wrong so the entire field can learn and improve.

100%
Models Documented
Public
Safety Reports
1

Input Validation & Sanitization

Adversarial input detection, prompt injection defense

2

Constitutional Constraints

Hard-coded behavioral boundaries and refusal patterns

3

Output Filtering & Verification

Multi-stage content classification and fact-checking

4

Human Oversight Integration

Escalation triggers, uncertainty thresholds, audit trails

5

Continuous Monitoring & Response

Real-time anomaly detection, kill-switch capability

Defense-in-Depth Architecture

Our five-layer safety framework ensures that even if one defense fails, multiple independent systems prevent harmful outputs. No single point of failure.

  • Fail-Safe Defaults Systems default to safe behavior when uncertain or under attack
  • Independent Verification Separate systems validate outputs without shared failure modes
  • Graceful Degradation Reduced capability under stress, never catastrophic failure
  • Immutable Audit Logs Every decision traceable for post-incident analysis
Red Team Operations

Adversarial Testing Program

We actively try to break our own systems before deploying them. Our red team operates with full adversarial mindset.

Prompt Injection Testing

Systematic attempts to bypass safety filters through adversarial prompts, jailbreaks, and context manipulation.

Hallucination Detection

Testing for confabulation under pressure, edge cases, and adversarial queries designed to elicit false confidence.

Bias & Fairness Audits

Probing for demographic biases, stereotyping, and differential treatment across protected categories.

Capability Elicitation

Attempting to unlock hidden capabilities through multi-turn manipulation and context engineering.

Data Extraction Attempts

Testing resistance to training data memorization and privacy-violating information retrieval.

Distribution Shift Testing

Evaluating robustness under out-of-distribution inputs, novel domains, and temporal drift.

Our Safety Commitments

These are not aspirations, they are binding operational principles that govern every deployment decision we make.

Human oversight on high-stakes decisions
No autonomous lethal applications
Transparent incident reporting
Third-party safety audits
Bias testing before deployment
Rapid response to discovered vulnerabilities

"AI must never be the last responsible actor."

The Accountability Invariant, TeraSystemsAI

Partner on Safe AI Development

Whether you're deploying AI in healthcare, finance, or critical infrastructure, we can help you build systems that stay safe under pressure.